Territorial Power-Sharing

0

Territorial Power-Sharing involves the delegation of power to a regional or local level, where a minority group may be in a majority, so as to give them some form of self-governance. Our research the different forms territorial power-sharing can take, and the pros and cons for such a technique, in particular for women.

tab two animations

1 Territorial power-sharing can be understood as the sharing of the central government’s powers and responsibilities to geographical units.

2 Territorial power-sharing is most often used in conflicts within states, where ethno-national groups are geographically concentrated in particular places and seek greater self-determination.

The proportion of all agreements that involve territorial power-sharing in all its forms

3 Different elements of all these forms of territorial subdivision are often combined in creative and multi-layered permutations.

Using territorial power-sharing to accommodate ethno-national groups is more likely to be part of a complex package of decentralizing powers to a variety of sub-state entities, sometimes building on earlier rhetorical commitments to federal principles, such as in Bosnia and Nepal.

Agreements with territorial power-sharing, by battle location

4 During negotiations on territorial power-sharing, there are critical decisions that have implications for inclusion, including:

Military power-sharing is often agreed as an alternative form of demobilisation, demilitarisation and reintegration (DDR) measures, or put in place as part of a wider attempt as security sector reform (SSR). DDR, SSR and forms of military power-sharing may all be part of a ‘security transition’, which is itself a political process.

Key issues which need decided in designing territorial power-sharing arrangements are:

How territory will be split
How power will be divided
How boundaries will be drawn
What this means for non-dominant minorities and women

5 Women from various identity groups may experience territorial power-sharing differently depending on whether they will find themselves as members of:

6 Recommendations

Recommendation 1

Territorial power-sharing can enable inclusion of the main conflict parties, but should also consider how wider social groups will be affected.

Recommendation 2

Symbolic naming of the arrangements may be more difficult than deciding on the arrangements, and creativity may be required.

Recommendation 3

Sequencing territorial devolution of power in stages, to build incremental agreement, can help build support for territorial power-sharing as a framework for a more inclusive state.

Recommendation 4

Creative techniques for formalising ‘unsettlement’ may present opportunities to accommodate different national groups' within one state to statehood. This can include:

Providing for incremental decision-making on powers
Providing for ‘fuzzy borders’
Providing for new choices as to the territory in the future (through postponed referenda)

Downloads

Territorial Power-Sharing (2.8 MB .PDF)

تقاسم السلطة الإقليمية (2.9 MB .PDF)

Territorial Power-Sharing

0

1