UN Review Processes: Politics and international state- and peacebuilding
Citation:
383706
VNVPVHC5
items
1
apa
0
default
asc
3912
https://peacerep.org/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3A%22zotpress-41fe3b6c7ecb70b5f14dce380e5a2add%22%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22VNVPVHC5%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A383706%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Pospisil%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222016%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EPospisil%2C%20J.%20%282016%29.%20%3Ci%3EUN%20Review%20Processes%3A%20Politics%20and%20international%20state-%20and%20peacebuilding%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%20%28PSRP%20Briefing%20Paper%209%29.%20Global%20Justice%20Academy%2C%20University%20of%20Edinburgh.%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22report%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22UN%20Review%20Processes%3A%20Politics%20and%20international%20state-%20and%20peacebuilding%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Jan%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Pospisil%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22reportNumber%22%3A%229%22%2C%22reportType%22%3A%22PSRP%20Briefing%20Paper%22%2C%22institution%22%3A%22Global%20Justice%20Academy%2C%20University%20of%20Edinburgh%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222016%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222019-02-19T19%3A44%3A38Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Pospisil, J. (2016). UN Review Processes: Politics and international state- and peacebuilding (PSRP Briefing Paper 9). Global Justice Academy, University of Edinburgh.
Download briefing paper.
Summary: This briefing paper examines three UN review documents produced in 2015 alongside the UN reform agenda and draws out key recommendations.
Key points:
• Call for reform of UN’s work in fragile and conflict-affected states and a more dynamic and political approach.
• Need for more inclusive partnerships.
• More realistic UN peacekeeping missions: sequenced, two-stage mandating process.
• Distinction between impartiality and neutrality.
• ‘Political arrangements’ in regions have to be taken into account.
Keywords:Â UN; Processes; Statebuilding; Peacebuilding; Gender
Return to search all publications
